The New York Post had room for the ‘Nazi’. What it didn’t have room for was Ben Azoulay’s 2008 conviction.
The New York Post has discovered Paul Miller.
Miller, also known as Gypsy Crusader, dominated Ben “King” Azoulay at the Kia Center in Orlando on a Duel Arena card on August 29th. The split decision, which confused many, was still considered a one-sided victory by the majority.
In the post-win interview when Miller took the microphone the mainstream media lost its collective mind.
Paul Miller wins via split decision against Ben Azoulay, then gets into a HEATED altercation with him after the fight pic.twitter.com/W9fFm8Xov2
— KickChamp (@Kick_Champ) August 30, 2026
“But like I said, I was going to crush him and throw him into the wind. He’s not a tough guy, he’s not some alpha male, he’s a short little fucking jew prick.”
Miller then threw a Roman Salute on the way out to a crowd full of white men and women who reciprocated the gesture. A man in the stands waved a swastika flag which a female staffer unsuccessfully tried to confiscate. Multiple fights broke out and angry attendees attacked Miller’s entourage as they were leaving the arena floor. Many people assumed Chris “Hammer” Pohlhaus had participated in the scuffle, however these accusations, like many thrown at Pohlhaus are overblown and defamatory.
The Anti-Defamation League, quoted on cue, calls Miller a “volatile white supremacist-accelerationist.” Chris Nesi wrote it up on September 3 under a headline that does the work before the first sentence: SS tattoo, Nazi salute, Jewish opponent. For those of you who don’t know, the ADL bragged about getting Paul Miller brought in on his gun charge. Many of Miller’s fans and supporters feel his incarceration was due to who he is and what he represents rather than the actual severity of his infraction.
The NY Post is kvetching! Kvetching is not reporting.
They refer to Azoulay as a Jewish influencer. Azoulay draped himself in an Israeli flag on the walkout. After his embarrassing loss he vowed to “take down every Anti Semite.” The paper’s moral geometry is simple: one corner is a costume from 1933, the other corner is the man fighting on behalf of Israel and ‘the jews.’ Once that geometric pattern is set, curiosity becomes a kind of vandalism.
The NY Post does not tell you who Ben Azoulay really is. In 2008, in Sherman Oaks, Ben Azoulay was 18 and the girl in question was 15. Azoulay admitted in open court to a violation of California Penal Code 288a(b)(1) oral copulation with a minor. A civil complaint alleged that Azoulay, his brother, and a friend assaulted her after she was given drinks and drugs at his parents’ house, which Azoulay maintains wasn’t rape.
The way California law works, Azoulay was not placed on the sex-offender registry. Azoulay has spent years calling the whole thing rumors and offering money for a document that says “rape conviction,” which is a sheisty lawyer’s dodge: the plea is still to a sex crime against a minor. So, in layman’s terms, he was civilly sued for date-raping a minor.
None of that is in the Post. Not a single sentence, not a parenthetical, not “Azoulay, who has a 2008 sex-crime plea he disputes the severity of.” The year 2008 is omitted. The charge number never comes up. The 15-year-old is ignored.
The NY Post had inches for the banner. It had inches for Orlando’s mayor. It had inches for a Kia Center spokesman and a local Jewish CEO who was supposedly nauseated. It had inches to tell you Miller is a felon on a gun case and that prosecutors once said he talked about a race war. It had inches for the “short little fucking jew prick” comment.
It did not have inches for CA PC 288a(b)(1).
That is not because the file is obscure or fake. The Guardian put the conviction in a fight story. Local papers in Beverly Hills put it in a school-board story after Azoulay was allowed to speak to a Jewish student club and the district was forced to apologize.
Azoulay has recorded his own explanations. Azoulay has also recorded himself talking as if God appointed him the Messiah, “the Jesus Christ of this time,” which sparked tremendous backlash online. The Post needed a symbol. The criminal record would have ruined the symbol. So the record went in the trash where the rest of the NY Post belongs.
If the omitted facts are “old,” the paper can say they are old. If Azoulay denies the civil claims, the paper can say he denies them. A newsroom that will not print the plea has already decided the reader should not weigh it.
“Jewish opponent” goes in the headline because it does the work. “Admitted in court to oral copulation with a minor” does not go in the body because it would undo the work subsequently painting Azoulay as the true villain of the story.
Azoulay can carry and claim to fight on behalf of a flag that many associate with an active genocide of tens of thousands of children alone. Azoulay can talk about Israel and can call himself a ‘king.’ Azoulay does not get a memory hole as a condition of the coverage. A 15-year-old in a plea is not less important because the man who pleaded later wrapped himself in a national banner the Post likes better than his opponents. Paul Miller fought under the American flag.
In an exclusive comment given to Leftover News, Miller explains why mainstream publications neglect to even mention Azoulay’s record.
“I think that they (NYP) scrutinize my criminal record, because at any time, to paint a Nazi as a horrible person, the Jewish media jumps on it. God forbid they want to point out the same Jew/the same kike that does this weird pedophile disgusting shit,” Miller explains. “They just overlook it. They think that as long as they’re painting, the Nazi is bad, and he’s the worst person on the planet, they can cover up his horrible crimes. There are a million times worse than anything I’ve ever done.”
The New York Post is kvetching about Paul Miller! This story is National News!
